Difference between revisions of "Bristol IMC Court Order"

From IndyMedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 6: Line 6:
  
 
Since then the only source of further information has been from [https://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2014/08/517810.html?c=on#c301096 an article in The Times] which reported that the PACE special procedure production order obtained by Avon and Somerset Police and served on Bytemark on 15th August 2014 ''"demands access to the details of administrators and bill-payers, login credentials, information on those who posted articles and the IP addresses of everyone who visited the site over an unspecified period"''.  The court order served on Bytemark hasn't been published. The Times has reported that the Police have said that, ''"No arrests have been made in connection with this incident"''.
 
Since then the only source of further information has been from [https://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2014/08/517810.html?c=on#c301096 an article in The Times] which reported that the PACE special procedure production order obtained by Avon and Somerset Police and served on Bytemark on 15th August 2014 ''"demands access to the details of administrators and bill-payers, login credentials, information on those who posted articles and the IP addresses of everyone who visited the site over an unspecified period"''.  The court order served on Bytemark hasn't been published. The Times has reported that the Police have said that, ''"No arrests have been made in connection with this incident"''.
 +
 +
Unfortunately a, [https://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2014/08/517805.html now hidden], fabricated article containing intentional lies,  claiming that ''"owing to an administration error by one of the techies all IP address details for the past 16 months were still stored on the server"'', was picked up by various sources, including The Times, before it was removed. This is a classic example of [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disinformation disinformation], ''"intentionally false or inaccurate information that is spread deliberately"'' used the classic tactic ''"to mix some truth and observation with false conclusions and lies"''. The propagation of this disinformation, as misinformation, ''"information that is unintentionally false"'' has occurred on activist discussion boards and Twitter.
  
  

Revision as of 19:15, 31 August 2014

Bytemark served with PACE special procedure production order for details from Bristol Indymedia

Bristol Indymedia has been hosted on a Bytemark Debian virtual server since 2005, up until November 2013 the site was running Oscailt, in March 2014 it was re-launched as a WordPress site "using the software modremoveip".

On 27th August 2014 Bristol Indymedia reported that, "the police had a court order to access the Bristol Indymedia server. We don’t know for sure, but assume that our web hosts have complied with the order and given the police this access". Bristol Indymedia disabled open publishing on the server and said "it is unlikely that open publishing of news items will ever be re-enabled as it would require complete re-installation of the server".

Since then the only source of further information has been from an article in The Times which reported that the PACE special procedure production order obtained by Avon and Somerset Police and served on Bytemark on 15th August 2014 "demands access to the details of administrators and bill-payers, login credentials, information on those who posted articles and the IP addresses of everyone who visited the site over an unspecified period". The court order served on Bytemark hasn't been published. The Times has reported that the Police have said that, "No arrests have been made in connection with this incident".

Unfortunately a, now hidden, fabricated article containing intentional lies, claiming that "owing to an administration error by one of the techies all IP address details for the past 16 months were still stored on the server", was picked up by various sources, including The Times, before it was removed. This is a classic example of disinformation, "intentionally false or inaccurate information that is spread deliberately" used the classic tactic "to mix some truth and observation with false conclusions and lies". The propagation of this disinformation, as misinformation, "information that is unintentionally false" has occurred on activist discussion boards and Twitter.


Corporate Coverage: The Times: Activist website Indymedia shuts down after police raid (repost) | The Bristol Post: Anarchist website Bristol Indymedia to close following police raid (repost)

Activist Coverage: Urban75: Indymedia Bristol raided by plod, servers accessed! | LibCom: Sources and the police raid on Bristol Indymedia