Difference between revisions of "Critique of current design"

From IndyMedia
Jump to: navigation, search
m (The UK site in June 2011)
Line 17: Line 17:
 
# The font for the main title could be changed to freshen the site up a bit. This is a fairly common free font so it lacks individuality and identity.
 
# The font for the main title could be changed to freshen the site up a bit. This is a fairly common free font so it lacks individuality and identity.
 
# The number of menu items could be reduced from nine to a maximum of 7.
 
# The number of menu items could be reduced from nine to a maximum of 7.
# The subtitle is far too long and somewhat verbose. For example it could read ''A network offering non-corporate news'' or even just ''Non-corporate news''. By making it shorter and a bigger font could be used is would be more likely to get read.
+
# The subtitle is far too long and somewhat verbose. For example it could read ''A network offering non-corporate news'' or even just ''Non-corporate news''. By making it shorter and thus allowing a bigger font more people will actually read it. Ideas for a [[UK subhead | new subhead here]].
 
# Not the best rendition of the IMC logo. Some alternative ideas [[Logos | here]]
 
# Not the best rendition of the IMC logo. Some alternative ideas [[Logos | here]]
 
# The font is not the best/most appropriate choice and is slightly out of alignment too.
 
# The font is not the best/most appropriate choice and is slightly out of alignment too.
 
# Could move the search box out of the newswire section.  
 
# Could move the search box out of the newswire section.  
 
# Colour: the current colours are quite nice. Red, white and blue strengthens the UK identity by subtly echoing the colours of the Union Jack. This could be strengthened to make the site a bit more colourful. But maybe we don't to identify with the flag at all? Though changing the colour scheme is perhaps best left for a more major redesign.
 
# Colour: the current colours are quite nice. Red, white and blue strengthens the UK identity by subtly echoing the colours of the Union Jack. This could be strengthened to make the site a bit more colourful. But maybe we don't to identify with the flag at all? Though changing the colour scheme is perhaps best left for a more major redesign.

Revision as of 11:49, 13 June 2011

The UK site in June 2011

This is how the site looks on a 1024x768 monitor with the browser set to maximised (full screen).

UK-website-screenshot01.png




UK-website-analysis.png


  1. The top section is too compressed. A bit more space would make it easier on the eye.
  2. The font for the main title could be changed to freshen the site up a bit. This is a fairly common free font so it lacks individuality and identity.
  3. The number of menu items could be reduced from nine to a maximum of 7.
  4. The subtitle is far too long and somewhat verbose. For example it could read A network offering non-corporate news or even just Non-corporate news. By making it shorter and thus allowing a bigger font more people will actually read it. Ideas for a new subhead here.
  5. Not the best rendition of the IMC logo. Some alternative ideas here
  6. The font is not the best/most appropriate choice and is slightly out of alignment too.
  7. Could move the search box out of the newswire section.
  8. Colour: the current colours are quite nice. Red, white and blue strengthens the UK identity by subtly echoing the colours of the Union Jack. This could be strengthened to make the site a bit more colourful. But maybe we don't to identify with the flag at all? Though changing the colour scheme is perhaps best left for a more major redesign.